On 14 February 2013 the European Commission adopted a proposal for a Council Directive implementing enhanced cooperation in the area of financial transaction tax, which reflected the scope and objectives of its original FTT proposal of September 2011. This follows the decision of the Council on 22 January 2013 to authorise enhanced cooperation between 11 Member States. Luxembourg decided not to participate in the enhanced cooperation on introducing an FTT.
According to the European Commission, the three core objectives of the FTT are:
The proposed Directive will now be discussed by Member States, with a view to its implementation under enhanced cooperation.
In September 2011, the Commission tabled a proposal for a common system of financial transactions tax, with the objectives of securing a coherent approach to taxing this sector in the Single Market, ensuring a fair contribution from the financial sector to public finances, and contributing to more efficiency and welfare enhancing financial sector trading.
Following intense discussions on this file, there was consensus at the ECOFIN meetings in summer 2012 that unanimity between the 27 Member States would not be reached within a reasonable period. Nonetheless, a number of Member States expressed a strong willingness to go ahead with the FTT. Therefore, in autumn 2012, 11 Member States wrote to the Commission, officially requesting enhanced cooperation on the financial transaction tax to be authorised, on the basis of the Commission's 2011 proposal.
The Commission carefully assessed these requests against the criteria for enhanced cooperation in the Treaties. In particular, it was established that enhanced cooperation on the FTT would not have a negative impact on the Single Market or on obligations, rights and competences of non-participating Member States. On the basis of that assessment, in October 2012, the Commission proposed a Decision to allow enhanced cooperation on the FTT. This was backed by the European Parliament in December and agreed by European Finance Ministers at the ECOFIN in January 2013.
Once the green light for enhanced cooperation had been given, the Commission could proceed with the detailed proposal on the FTT to be applied by the 11 Member States, which it has presented on 14 February 2013.
Press Release - European Commission - 14 February 2013
A financial transaction tax (FTT) is a tax applied to financial transactions, usually at a very low rate. A financial transaction applies to the exchange of financial instruments between banks or other financial institutions. The financial instruments in question include securities, bonds, shares and derivatives.
They do not include the transactions typically undertaken by retail banks in their relations with private households or businesses, except when they relate to the sale or purchase of bonds or shares.
What is a financial institution?
The definition of a financial institution in the Commission's proposal covers a wide range of institutions in order to avoid circumvention of the tax and includes essentially investment firms, organised markets, credit institutions, insurance companies, collective investment undertakings and their managers, alternative investment funds (such as hedge funds), financial leasing companies and special purpose entities.
What is the difference between transactions carried out on organised markets or over the counter?
Within the derivatives markets, many products are traded through exchanges on organised markets. Products traded on the exchange must be standardised for the purpose of transparent trading.
Non-standard products are traded in the so-called over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives markets. OTC derivatives have a less standard structure and are traded bilaterally (between two parties).
What is the residence principle?
The financial transaction tax would be based on the principle of tax residence of the financial institution or trader. Taxation would therefore take place in the Member State in which the establishment of the financial institution involved in the transaction was deemed to be located. This would help to reduce the risk of relocation, because a financial transaction would be taxed in each case where an EU resident was involved even if the transaction was carried out outside the EU.
MEMO/11/640 - European Commission, 28 September 2011
Enhanced cooperation is when a group of at least 9 Member States decide to move ahead with an initiative proposed by the Commission, once it proves impossible to reach unanimous agreement on it within a reasonable period. It is only relevant to policy areas which require unanimity, and it aims to overcome the situation whereby certain Member States are prevented from advancing with a common approach due to the reluctance and non-agreement of others.
Clear provisions and conditions for enhanced cooperation are set out in Article 20 of the TEU and Articles 326 to 334 (TFEU).
Financial Transaction Tax through Enhanced Cooperation: Questions and Answers
Reference: MEMO/13/98 - 14 February 2013
Eleven Member States, representing 2/3 of EU GDP, have been authorised to establish the common financial transaction tax under enhanced cooperation. These are: Belgium, Germany, Estonia, Greece, Spain, France, Italy, Austria, Portugal, Slovenia and Slovakia.
Financial Transaction Tax through Enhanced Cooperation: Questions and Answers
Reference: MEMO/13/98 - 14 February 2013
Yes. One of the conditions of enhanced cooperation under the Treaties is that it should be open to any other Member State joining at a later stage if it wishes to do so. In order to join, the Member State would need to submit a request to the Commission, which would then assess this against the criteria set out in the Treaty (as it did the initial requests).
Financial Transaction Tax through Enhanced Cooperation: Questions and Answers
Reference: MEMO/13/98 - 14 February 2013
In line with the requests of the 11 Member States, today's proposal very much reflects the Commission's original FTT proposal in terms of scope and objectives.
When it comes to objectives, they remain exactly the same. These are:
- To tackle fragmentation of the Single Market that an uncoordinated patchwork of national financial transaction taxes would create;
- To ensure that the financial sector makes a fair and substantial contribution to public finances and covering the cost of the crisis, particularly as it is currently under-taxed compared to other sectors;
- To create appropriate disincentives for financial transactions which do not contribute to the efficiency of financial markets or to the real economy
With regard to the scope of the FTT, it again mirrors the 2011 proposal, in that:
- The base of the tax is very wide, covering transactions carried out by financial institutions on all financial instruments and markets, once there is an established economic link to the FTT-zone
- The rates are low, at 0.1% for shares and bonds, units of collective investment funds, money market instruments, repurchase agreements and securities lending agreements, and 0.01% for derivative products. These are proposed minimum rates, and participating Member States would be free to apply higher rates if they wanted to. The tax would have to be paid by each financial institution involved in the transaction;
- Day-to-day financial activities of ordinary citizens and businesses (e.g. insurance contracts, mortgage and business lending, credit card transactions, payment services, deposits, spot currency transactions etc.) are excluded from the FTT, in order to protect the real economy;
- The raising of capital (i.e. primary issuance of shares and bonds, units of collective investment funds) and certain restructuring operations will not be taxed. Also, excluded from the scope of the FTT are financial transactions with the ECB and national central banks, the EFSF and ESM;
- The "residence principle" remains a core element to safeguard against the relocation of financial transactions. Under the residence principle, who is party to the transaction is what counts, not where it takes place. If a financial institution involved in the transaction is established in the FTT zone, or is acting on behalf of a party established in this zone, then the transaction will be taxed, regardless of where it takes place in the world;
To further prevent avoidance of the tax, the Commission has added to this proposal the "issuance principle". This means that a transaction will also be taxed, whenever and wherever it takes place, if it involves financial instruments issued in one of the participating Member States.
Financial Transaction Tax through Enhanced Cooperation: Questions and Answers
Reference: MEMO/13/98 - 14 February 2013
Any changes in today's proposal compared to the one in 2011 serve one of two purposes: either to provide more legal clarity, where it was seen to be necessary, or to reinforce anti-abuse and anti-avoidance provisions, as the 11 participating Member States had requested. The main changes are:
- Issuance principle has been added as an anti-avoidance measure (see below for more details). A general and a specific anti-abuse clause have also been added to the proposal;
- Member States and other public bodies, when managing public debt, are now explicitly excluded from the scope of the Directive;
- ECB, EFSF and ESM are now explicitly referred to as being exempt from FTT
- Exchanges of financial instruments will now be considered as two transactions for tax purposes, while repurchase and reverse repurchase agreements and securities lending and borrowing will be regarded as only one transaction, as they are economically equivalent to a (single) credit operation;
- The issuance of shares and units in collective investment funds and restructuring operations are now also excluded from the scope.
Financial Transaction Tax through Enhanced Cooperation: Questions and Answers
Reference: MEMO/13/98 - 14 February 2013
The European Banking Federation (EBF) calls on the ECOFIN Council to carefully consider the implications of any decision on the implementation of a Financial Transaction Tax (FTT). Together with another eight major associations, representing various sectors of the financial services industry, the Federation voices serious concerns over the introduction of the proposed Financial Transaction Tax under the enhanced cooperation procedure in 11 Member States. In a letter to EU Finance Ministers the associations outline the wider effects it would have across the EU and even beyond.
Le 14 février 2013, la Commission européenne a adopté une proposition de directive du Conseil mettant en œuvre la coopération renforcée dans le domaine de la taxe sur les transactions financières (TTF).
Le Luxembourg a décidé de ne pas adhérer à l'introduction d'une telle taxe dans le cadre de la coopération renforcée.
The implementation, by part of the Member States of the European Union only, of the European Commission’s proposal for a Financial Transaction Tax (FTT) under the enhanced cooperation procedure (ECP), i.e. a procedure that has hitherto only been used twice in the fields of divorce law and patents, raises several substantive questions from a legal perspective, which, for the time being, remain largely unresolved.
Compared to the frequently glacial pace of European bureaucracy, the Financial Transaction Tax (FTT) has moved through EU decision-making processes at a surprisingly high speed. When it became clear in 2012 that EU member states had insurmountable divergences of opinion on the question whether to introduce a financial transaction tax, the most fervent members decided to speed up things by going down the (nearly) untested road of “enhanced cooperation procedure”.
The “new” proposal for a Council Directive implementing an FTT in just 11 EU Member States (FTT-zone) will lead to significant costs on savings and reduction in future pension levels of EU citizens. EU savers in UCITS will pay EUR 13 billion of FTT annually.
Because of numerous errors in its design, the Financial Transaction Tax will mean the death of the European fund industry. ALFI, the Association of the Luxembourg Fund Industry, rejects the European Commission proposal for a Council Directive implementing enhanced cooperation in the area of financial transaction tax,published on 14 February 2013. ALFI believes that the financial transaction tax, (FTT), which will eventually be imposed on ALL Member States whether they have opted for this tax or not, will not achieve the main objectives set out by the Commission.
The European Banking Federation (EBF) reiterates its concerns over the proposal for a Financial Transaction Tax (FTT), adopted by the European Commission on 14 February 2013 . The controversial tax would be implemented by 11 Member States under enhanced cooperation and is expected to claw back a yearly revenue of EUR 30-35 billion from the financial sector.
The details of the Financial Transaction Tax (FTT) to be implemented under enhanced cooperation have been set out in a proposal adopted by the Commission on 14 February 2013.
The European Banking Federation (EBF) is concerned about the decision adopted by EU Finance Ministers at their meeting in Brussels, 22 January, authorising 11 Member States to proceed with a Financial Transaction Tax (FTT) through enhanced cooperation.
Although Luxembourg will not participate in the Financial Transaction Tax project to be launched in 11 EU countries under an enhanced cooperation procedure, the FTT is a subject that enjoys a lot of attention in the financial centre. At a conference the ABBL organised on the FTT, in cooperation with ACI, Jan Eger, Government Affairs Executive at Reuters, and Rüdiger Jung, Head of Legal and Tax at the ABBL, provided some fascinating insights into the FTT’s potential implications on financial markets and on the Luxembourg financial centre, respectively.



