Taxation of savings for Luxembourg residents
Since 2006, a final flat rate withholding tax of 10% is levied on the interest income of Luxembourg resident individuals. The income liable to fall under this withholding tax is the same as that defined in the EU Savings Directive (exept UCI income).
The EU Savings Taxation Directive
In the EU, the taxation of individual non-residents' income received from savings falls under the Savings Taxation Directive 2003/48/EC. The latter applies to the income from interest on capital paid to individuals resident in an EU member state other than the one where the interest is paid. It has been applicable since July 2005.
In order to ensure that cross-border payments of interest in savings are properly taxed no matter where these payments have been made, the directive currently proposes the following concepts:
Austria, Belgium and Luxembourg have opted to introduce a non final withholding tax on income on products falling under the scope of the directive. The rate of this tax increased gradually: 15% from July 2005 until July 2008, 20% until July 2011. Since then, the taxe rate is 35%. 75% of the tax collected is transferred to the state where the saver is a resident, while the remaining 25% go to the state collecting the tax. The member state of residence grants a tax credit or a refund of the full amount of this specific withholding tax if properly declared by the client in his tax return.
Exemption certificate: The foreign client can avoid the 35% withholding tax by delivering to his Luxembourg bank a withholding tax exemption certificate.
This means that member state's paying agents will report through their competent authorities to the tax administrations of the country of origin of their clients, a list of all non resident savers who received an interest income during the calendar year, as well as the amount of income paid to each of them individually. The majority of member states have opted for this option.
Luxembourg also provides information in accordance with the Directive if foreign clients opt for voluntary disclosure in order not to be subject to the withholding tax.
Exchange of information mandate: For Luxembourg clients, there is also another procedure to obtain relief from the EU withholding tax on interest, namely the exchange of information procedure (article 9 (1) a) of the Savings Directive. This procedure leads to a double exchange of information:
Since in Luxembourg paying agents (banks) need to ask customers beforehand whether they agree to such a kind of of information exchange, the paying agent (bank) can only proceed with the exchange of information if the client has given an explict and unconditionnal mandate to the paying agent to transfer information to the foreign tax authority. Below you will find models for such a mandate in French, German and English. Please note that this is only a model, the mandate proposed to clients by the banks established in Luxembourg may slightly differ in wording.
Geographical scope
In order to avoid an excessive flow of capital out of the European Union, the European Commission also negotiated with third countries (Switzerland, Liechtenstein, Monaco, Andorra, San Marino) and dependent or associated territories (British Virgin Islands, Gibraltar, Guernsey, Isle of Man, Jersey, Netherlands Antilles, Turks and Caicos Islands, Montserrat, Cayman Islands, Anguilla, Aruba). These countries now apply the same or equivalent provisions to the directive.
The European Commission, on the request of the ECOFIN Council, is also negotiating with a number of important financial centres, like Hong Kong or Singapore, in order to extend the geographical scope of the directive.
Amending Proposal
On 13 November 2008, the European Commission adopted an amending proposal to the Savings Taxation Directive. Amongst other things, the amendments propose to extend the scope to income that is equivalent to interest obtained via investments in certain innovative financial products, in certain life insurance products or certain companies as well as via an UCI fulfilling certain conditions.
The Council has not yet unanimously agreed to this proposal as there is still a lack of political conensus.
Le ministre des Finances Luc Frieden s’est rendu hier au Conseil Ecofin à Bruxelles où les ministres des Finances ont, entre autres, discuté du mandat que la Commission européenne souhaite obtenir pour négocier avec les pays tiers dans le cadre de la directive "fiscalité de l’épargne". Il s’agit d’un dossier qui apparaît régulièrement à l’ordre du jour de l’Ecofin et pour lequel il n’a pas encore été possible de trouver une solution acceptable.
Luc Rodesch, Head of the ABBL's Private Banking Group, on changing client profiles, "Rubik", and future challenges and opportunities for the Luxembourg private banking industry.
Switzerland recently signed tax agreements with Germany and the United Kingdom. According to these deals, Switzerland would levy taxes in line with German, respectively British tax law. Although the European Commission is loath to admit it, these deals represent a game changer in the European discussions on the Savings Directive. With the UK and Germany, two major EU countries have now officially endorsed a withholding tax system.
Le Forum mondial sur la transparence et l’échange de renseignements à des fins fiscales (Forum mondial) a adopté le rapport d’évaluation par les pairs du Luxembourg. Le Luxembourg a réussi la première phase de l’examen par les pairs qui a débuté en janvier 2011. Le rapport analyse la conformité du cadre légal et réglementaire en matière de transparence et d’échange de renseignements du Luxembourg avec le standard international.
The Swiss and UK authorities have just initialed the terms of a forthcoming tax agreement that should allow Swiss bankers to levy taxes in Switzerland according to UK tax law.
The Swiss and German authorities have just initialed the terms of a forthcoming tax agreement that should allow Swiss bankers to levy taxes in Switzerland according to German tax law. With this agreement, the European Union’s largest country agrees to the principle of a final withholding tax on the income of cross-border savings. Thus, Germany endorses a model of taxation which represents an alternative to the automatic exchange of information. This fundamentally changes the debate on the taxation of savings in all of the European Union.
Les recettes payées à des non-résidents dans le cadre de la fiscalité des revenus de l’épargne sous forme de paiements d’intérêts (directive 2003/48/CE du 3 juin 2003) s’élève en 2010 à 98 303 895,38 euros. Ces transferts représentent 75% des recettes perçues.
Le 18 janvier 2010, une contribution écrite du ministre des Finances, Luc Frieden, a été publiée dans plusieurs journaux européens, à savoir dans Le Figaro, Financial Times Deutschland et Expansion. Sous le titre "Une nouvelle ambition pour la fiscalité en Europe", Luc Frieden se prononce sur les débats actuels en matière de fiscalité des revenus de l'épargne ainsi que sur la lutte contre la fraude fiscale.
The present article aims to provide some insight into recent developments concerning the EU Savings Directive.
Two aspects are to be considered separately:
- the scope of the proposal, i.e. the technical details, such as the products covered, and
- the political aspects, such as the issue of exchange of information vs withholding tax.
Il est à prévoir que la ratification des avenants conduira à une augmentation du nombre de demandes de renseignements provenant de l’étranger. Cette situation soulèvera certainement beaucoup de questions, tant du coté des administrations concernées que du côté des banques. En prenant des décisions, les membres de l’ABBL, en tant que personnes tierces, doivent tenir compte à la fois des intérêts de l’Etat comme de ceux de leurs clients directement concernés. Même en prenant en considération la pression du temps, mais justement « afin d'assurer que l'échange de renseignements auquel l'Etat luxembourgeois s'est engagé puisse être exécuté de façon efficace et dans un cadre légal clair », l’ABBL aurait préféré que le projet de loi soit plus précis sur un certain nombre de points de nature procédurale notamment.



